The Shut Door vs. Dwight Moody and Ira Sankey
|Dwight L. Moody
This accusation comes to us from Doctrines of Demons, a 1999 booklet by
former Adventist and retired physician Jack Gent, who was born in 1922.
Like other critics, Gent claims that Ellen White taught that no more sinners could
be converted. He adds an interesting twist to this allegation by pointing out that at
the same time Ellen White
was supposed to be teaching this particular version of the "shut door,"
many were being converted in the "great crusades" of D. L. Moody and I. D. Sankey.
If no more sinners could be saved, how come Moody and Sankey were so successful
in leading people to Christ?
Here's how Jack Gent put it:
If the door was shut, no further conversions were possible.
No one who was unconverted before October 22, 1844, could
after that date be converted. Yet, as opponents of the Shut
Door continually pointed out, sinners continued to accept
Christ and become Christians -- for instance, at the great
crusades then being held by Moody and Sankey. These apparent
conversions, which seemed to prove that the door wasn't shut,
was [sic.] a problem that was taken up and answered by the vision.—bold added.
|Ira D. Sankey
Of course Gent's concerns would be legitimate, if they were true. However, we note the
following facts about Moody and Sankey:
- Dwight L. Moody was born on February 5, 1837, and therefore had just turned 12 at the time of Ellen White's vision.
- Ira D. Sankey was born on August 28, 1840, and therefore was still 8 at the time of the vision.
- Moody began missionary work in 1860, 11 years after the vision.
- Moody met Sankey in 1870, 21 years after the vision.
Thus Moody and Sankey were not seeing a lot of conversions during
public crusades in 1849. What they were seeing in elementary school we do not know.
We find it highly disturbing that Jack Gent did not provide for his readers
widely and readily available quotations such as the following. These quotations
demonstrate that there were hardly any conversions to Christ within the denominations,
even before October 22, 1844.
Take note that this particular quotation is from none other than the learned Albert Barnes:
At a meeting of the presbytery of Philadelphia, Mr.
Barnes, author of a commentary widely used and pastor
of one of the leading churches in that city, "stated that he had
been in the ministry for twenty years, and never, till the last
Communion, had he administered the ordinance without
receiving more or less into the church. But now there are no
awakenings, no conversions, not much apparent growth in
grace in professors, and none come to his study to converse
about the salvation of their souls. With the increase of
business, and the brightening prospects of commerce and
manufacture, there is an increase of worldly-mindedness.
Thus it is with all the denominations."—Congregational
Journal, May 23, 1844.—Great Controversy, pp. 376, 377.
Since there really were no great number of conversions around the
time period in question, the prevailing climate of the Christian community
did nothing to contradict the idea of a shut door of mercy for sinners.
And yet Ellen White always claimed that her
visions never taught the no-more-mercy-for-sinners version of
the "shut door." While she claimed to still believe in a different version of the shut
door, one that still held out mercy for sinners, she steadfastly maintained that
her visions had never taught the extreme version.
Give Us Your Opinion
|What are your thoughts on Moody, Sankey, and the "Shut Door"?