< Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next >
"Ellen White's Contradictions on Jewelry"
Further Analysis
Ella Robinson
Why was Ella wearing that necklace of shells (Ministry, Oct. 1989, p. 10) that particular day?
We don't have a clue. But back in 1991 we were discussing our concerns about this picture with Esther Dubosque,
who happened to be the wife of a Seventh-day Adventist evangelist. Lo and behold to our surprise, Esther stated
emphatically, "That was my grandmother, and she did not wear jewelry."
What could we say? Esther certainly knew her grandmother better than we did, since we never met the lady.
Esther added, "She lived at the end of her life at Eden Valley Institute."
When it comes to upholding standards of dress and modesty, Eden Valley is one of those places that would
make Charles Spurgeon, John Wesley, Charles Finney,
and Ellen White proud. It would be highly unlikely that
Ella would have been wearing necklaces there, even ones made of shell.
But why did the White Estate remove the necklace from the picture? Good question. We don't know.
Obviously, their purpose, unlike that of Dirk's picture's editor, was not to slander. And it's
hard to condemn them too harshly when photography studios routinely remove moles, scars, and wrinkles
from portraits everyday. But it would have been wiser if they had left it alone, given the number of critics out
there just waiting to make the most out of any discrepancy they can find.
"Early SDA's"
As quoted previously, Dirk Anderson's
web page states, "The alteration [in that 1913 photograph] is necessary in
order to perpetuate the myth that early SDA's did not wear jewelry." Guess we hadn't heard of that myth before.
As we look through Sydney's Cleveland's book, we find another picture of Ella Robinson, this time
wearing a pocket watch around her neck. Judging from the similarity in shade to her light collar, we'd
say it was probably silver in color, not gold. Her husband Dora is also wearing a pocket watch and chain.
Then there's a picture of Mrs. Hettie Haskell wearing a pocket watch suspended around her neck and
tucked into her garment near her waist. Cleveland's caption says that Hettie's watch was gold, but we
can't verify that from the black and white picture.
Regardless, neither Ellen White nor the Adventist church has ever taken a stand against wearing watches.
Perhaps an outrageously expensive or gaudy one, yes, but not all watches. Watches serve a utilitarian,
non-ornamental purpose.
The rest of Cleveland's evidence consists of a total of five other pictures of four people from
three families, and they are definitely wearing something, though what they were wearing is hard to tell.
If we assume that in each case they are indeed
wearing ornamental jewelry, even then, the paucity of evidence that Cleveland gives us does not rule out
the possibility that most early Adventists did indeed practice what they preached on the subject of jewelry.
Brooches
While we can't tell for sure that Ellen White was wearing a decorative brooch in the photo
in question, unless one wants to argue that all brooches are decorative, she definitely
was wearing a brooch. What did she use brooches for, anyway? Describing her appearance at a meeting,
her grandson had this to say:
|
Her plain white collar was fastened with a simple brooch, and
she was hatless, though several in the congregation and on the
platform wore hats.—Arthur White, The Later Elmshaven Years, p. 30.
|
It sounds to us like the "simple brooch" of yesteryear was used like the average, simple belt buckle,
and thus had a utilitarian purpose. It was a way to fasten a lady's collar together. We are unaware of any
instances where Ellen White, Spurgeon, Wesley, or Finney ever condemned the use of simple belt buckles or
brooches or pocket watches. If any of our readers know of such instances, please forward them to us
without delay.
Charles Finney: Presbyterian & Congregational Revivalist; President of Oberlin College
Okay, let's look at what this renowned revivalist of yesteryear had to say on the topic of jewelry:
|
When a young lady begins to backslide, she will begin to put on ornaments, jewelry, and costly attire.
These things are natural indications of the state of the heart.—The Finney Sermon
Collection, vol. 2, p. 838.
|
Charles Spurgeon: Baptist Evangelist
Notice how Spurgeon waxes elegant on this topic, expressing his definite concern:
|
But it is marvellous, while many are
taking all the trouble they can to array this poor body, they have very few
ornaments for their soul; they forgot to dress the soul. . . .
really the children of God cannot now be told by outward
appearance from the children of the devil, and they really ought to be;
there should be some distinction between the one and the other; and
although religion allows distinction of rank and dress, yet everything in the
Bible cries out against our arraying ourselves, and making ourselves proud,
by reason of the goodliness of our apparel. Some will say, "I wish you
would leave that alone!" Of course you do, because it applies to yourself.
But we let nothing alone which we believe to be in the Scriptures; and
while I would not spare any man's soul, honesty to every man's
conscience and honesty to myself demands, that I should always speak of
that which I see to be an evil breaking out in the Church. We should
always take care that in everything we keep as near as possible to the
written Word.—Sermon Collection, vol.
1, pp. 516, 517.
|
So, Brother Spurgeon, how should we dress? What sort of adornments may we wear?
|
If some people had a little more piety, they would not require such a showy dress; if they had a
little more godliness, to set them off, they would have no need whatever to
be always decorating themselves. The best ear-rings that a woman can
wear, are the ear-rings of hearing the Word with attention. . . . the very
best dress we can ever wear, is a garment wrought by the Holy Spirit, the
garment of a consistent conduct. . . .
It would be a good thing, perhaps, if we went back to Wesley's rule, to come out from
the world in our apparel, and to dress as plainly and neatly as the Quakers . . . .
If you want ornaments here they are. Here are jewels, rings,
dresses, and all kinds of ornament; men and women, ye may dress
yourselves up till ye shine like angels. How can you do it? By dressing
yourselves out in benevolence, in love to the saints, in honesty and
integrity, in uprightness, in godliness, in brotherly-kindness, in charity.
These are the ornaments which angels themselves admire, and which even
the word will admire; for men must give admiration to the man or the
woman who is arrayed in the jewels of a holy life and godly conversation. I
beseech you, brethren, "adorn the doctrine of God our Savior
in all things."—Ibid.
|
John Wesley: Founder of Methodism
And from the founder of the church Ellen White grew up in:
|
What is then the meaning of these scriptures [1 Pet. 3:3, 4; 1 Tim. 2:9, 10]? What is it which they
forbid? They manifestly forbid ordinary Christians, those in the lower or
middle ranks of lift, to be adorned with gold, or pearls, or costly apparel.—Works of John Wesley,
vol. 7, p. 30.
|
The Apostles Peter and Paul
So where did Ellen White, Spurgeon, Finney, and Wesley get these ideas from?
|
In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel,
with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold,
or pearls, or costly array; But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works. (1 Tim. 2:9, 10)
Whose adorning let it not be that outward adorning of plaiting
the hair, and of wearing of gold, or of putting on of apparel;
But let it be the hidden man of the heart, in that which is not
corruptible, even the ornament of a meek and quiet spirit, which
is in the sight of God of great price. For after this manner
in the old time the holy women also, who trusted in God, adorned
themselves. (1 Pet. 3:3-5)
|
Other parts of the Bible also discuss the subject, but we'll stop with these.
Give Us Your Opinion #2
We're almost done, but we still need to talk about the $10 pin that Dirk criticizes Ellen White for wearing.
And wait till you read in Ellen White's own words about her gold watch. It's quite remarkable. But before we go
on, we want to give you an opportunity to comment on these quotes we've just looked at:
| What do you think about jewelry in light of the above quotes? |
| It's too bad that some people are more interested in criticizing than in saving souls. I suspect that Dirk, Sanders, and Cleveland would have searched through Ellen White's trunk too, if they had the chance. |
 75.3% |
| Wow! Peter and Paul really wrote that? I believe Christians should follow the Bible, so I guess we shouldn't be wearing ornamental jewelry. I've decided that I'm going to follow the Bible in this area of my life. |
 21.3% |
| Regardless of what Peter, Paul, Wesley, Spurgeon, or Finney wrote, I think there's nothing wrong with wearing all the jewelry you want, wherever you want: ears, fingers, tongues, eyebrows, and belly buttons. |
 2.2% |
| I'm a Baptist/Methodist/Presbyterian, and I've never heard anyone ever say we shouldn't be wearing ornamental jewelry. Why not? What's happened to my church? Why have we drifted away from what we used to teach? |
 1.1% |
Total Votes: 89
|
|
< Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next >
|
